Classify the equation and read the requested quantity before calculating. Check every candidate against the original equations and their restrictions.
Nonlinear questions become more manageable when you identify the structure before calculating. Is the prompt asking for roots, an intersection, a parameter, or an expression involving the solutions? The requested quantity determines how much algebra you need.
Match the structure to a method
| Structure | Useful first move | Final check |
|---|---|---|
| A product equals zero | Set each factor equal to zero | Include every valid root |
| One variable is isolated in a system | Substitute into the other equation | Verify both coordinates |
| Number of quadratic roots | Use the discriminant | Confirm the equation remains quadratic |
| A denominator or radical | Record restrictions before transforming | Test candidates in the original equation |
Graphing can help locate intersections and check a result. For an exact value or a parameter condition, use the equations to verify what the graph suggests. A graphing window can hide an intersection or make two close roots look like one.
Worked example: substitution and two intersections
Every example in this guide is an original teaching exercise, not a released SAT question.
Solve y = x² − 5 and x + y = 1. Substitute to obtain x + x² − 5 = 1, so x² + x − 6 = 0. Factoring gives (x + 3)(x − 2) = 0, hence x = −3 or x = 2.
For x = −3, y = 4; for x = 2, y = −1. Both pairs satisfy the original equations: −3 + 4 = 1 and 2 + (−1) = 1. The solutions are (−3, 4) and (2, −1). If asked for the sum of the x-coordinates, report −1 rather than either coordinate alone.
Worked example: a squared variable does not create a free sign choice
For y² = 4x + 1 and y = x + 1, substitution gives (x + 1)² = 4x + 1. Thus x² − 2x = 0 and x(x − 2) = 0. The coordinate pairs are (0, 1) and (2, 3). They satisfy both original equations.
Do not attach an arbitrary negative y-coordinate after solving for x: the equation y = x + 1 fixes y. If you take a square root during another method, retain both branches where appropriate and then check the second equation.
Worked example: squaring can introduce an extraneous root
Solve √(x + 3) = x − 1. The right side must be nonnegative, so x ≥ 1. Squaring gives x + 3 = x² − 2x + 1, or x² − 3x − 2 = 0. Its roots are (3 ± √17)/2.
Only (3 + √17)/2 is at least 1, so it is the valid solution. The other root is negative and cannot satisfy the original equation's nonnegative right side. The restriction eliminates it; substitution into the original equation confirms the remaining root. A transformed equation supplies candidates, not automatic solutions.
Worked example: a cancelled factor still restricts the domain
Solve (x − 2)/(x² − 4) = 1. The original denominator excludes x = 2 and x = −2. Factoring and cancelling for permitted x gives 1/(x + 2) = 1, so x = −1. Checking the original gives (−3)/(−3) = 1.
Multiplying through without restrictions produces x − 2 = x² − 4, or (x − 2)(x + 1) = 0. The candidate x = 2 must still be rejected because the original expression is undefined there.
Worked example: a hidden quadratic
For x⁴ − 5x² + 4 = 0, let u = x². Then u² − 5u + 4 = (u − 1)(u − 4) = 0. Thus x² = 1 or x² = 4, giving x = −2, −1, 1, 2. Returning from u to x is essential: 1 and 4 are not the final roots.
Parameters and the number of real solutions
For x² − 6x + k = 0, the discriminant is 36 − 4k. There is one distinct real root when k = 9, two when k < 9, and none when k > 9. This classification works because the coefficient of x² is fixed and nonzero.
If a parameter controls the leading coefficient, inspect the case where that coefficient is zero separately; the equation may become linear. For a contextual problem, also apply conditions such as positive lengths or whole-number counts.
Review errors by method selection, sign, omitted root, domain restriction, and wrong requested quantity. For more on root relationships, read Vieta and the zero-product rule. For linear systems, use the linear systems guide.
Official sources
Next step
